Author-led IP and terminology
Definitions, boundaries and relationships within DIO/ODI, the K6 semantic connectome and the related conceptual layer.
Author of Digital Identity Optimization and Ontology of Digital Identity, with professional experience in meaning, SEO, digital communication and digital identity optimization.
Authorial position
Daniel Beránek leads the conceptual, strategic, research and communication layers of DIO/ODI.
He articulated the concept from professional practice spanning meaning, sales, journalism, copywriting, SEO, web technologies and digital identities. His academic background in psychology and communication studies made it possible to connect practical representation problems with questions of interpretation, trust and relationships.
He does not present technical, institutional or capital capabilities that the project does not yet possess. He seeks them according to the specific delivery track and states clearly where additional capacity is needed.
Origins of the concept
DIO did not begin as a name in search of a problem. It emerged from recognizing a recurring object of work: an entity whose meaning must persist across people and different machine systems.
More than thirteen years of work with meaning, SEO, content, the web, brands, reputation and digital communication.
Recognition that seemingly separate tasks repeatedly address the same deeper problem: how an entity is represented, interpreted and reconstructed.
Naming DIO and ODI, creating a shared terminology and publishing a canonical multilingual edition.
The K6 model, the MVDIO minimal analytical model, the Reconstruction Failure Modes taxonomy and the distinction between applied DIO and theoretical ODI.
Reference Vocabulary v0.1.0, Reference Model v0.3.1, a canonical namespace and machine-readable serializations.
Three value tracks, an intervention design and paths to pilots, co-development, research or licensing.
What the author brings to the project
The role is not to possess every future technical capability. Its core is to preserve the concept’s invariant, define the problem precisely and connect relevant disciplines to practice.
Definitions, boundaries and relationships within DIO/ODI, the K6 semantic connectome and the related conceptual layer.
The ability to read digital traces, semantic conflicts, relationships, sources and the practical feasibility of interventions.
Connecting psychology, semiotics, communication, SEO, the semantic web, data and AI topics.
Translating the concept into a specific problem, audience, intervention, evidence requirement and next decision.
Stewardship of the expert narrative, source trail, documentation and communication with different partner groups.
The ability to keep the conceptual, research and communication layers of a specific project aligned.
Capabilities a partner should add
DIO/ODI does not need a universal team assembled before the problem is known. Each track requires a different combination of expertise, environment and responsibility.
Access to relevant public surfaces, internal content owners and decisions on priority changes.
A data engineering, entity resolution, knowledge graph or application team with an environment for evaluation.
Domain expertise, formalization, critical review, and grant or standards capacity.
Public work
The site does not rely on an unsupported claim of authorship. The live manifesto, canonical archival record and related works create a public timeline and citation trail.
The current conceptual development of DIO/ODI, its publication lineage and the K6 model.
Open the manifestoA versioned citation anchor for the vocabulary, model and machine-readable artifacts.
Review the releasePublic context for the experience from which the concept developed.
Read the professional biographyAuthorship and IP layer
DIO/ODI, its authorship and foundational IP remain with Daniel Beránek unless a specific agreement states otherwise.
New outputs, technical solutions, domain adaptations, data and derivative rights may have their own terms. These should be agreed before joint work, according to each party’s actual contribution.
Contact
Daniel Beránek can respond with a concrete path when it is clear which track the proposal concerns and what the collaboration is meant to test or create.